The long and short of this article is that I tried out a whole load of mocking frameworks and decided I liked NSubstitute the best. This is currently a reasonably simple decision, because on the whole, Moq, FakeItEasy, Rhino, JustMock and many others besides are all essentially syntactical best friends.
There may be some minor differences between “A.Fake<T>”, “MockRepository.GenerateStub<T>”, “Mock.Create<T>” and “new Mock<T>” but when you consider that this line of code sums them all up in one hit – you can see they are all in the same club.
mock.Setup(m => m.DoSomething()).Returns("Value");
This is specifically the Moq version, but asides from the two words that precede the lambda – this is what you’ll find almost everywhere. You may remember being warned to “beware yellow snow” when using ASP.NET templating, well in this case you get a sea of “((m => m))” or “(() => )” emoticons.
Here is the full Moq version for use when comparing with NSubstitute later. I wrote versions of this same simple scenario in something like eight mock frameworks.
var mock = new Mock<GameLanguage>(); mock.Setup(m => m.DoSomething()).Returns("Value"); var language = mock.Object; language.Fizz = "Fizz"; language.Buzz = "Buzz"; _target = new Game(language);
Enter NSubstitute and its neat use of extension methods.
I prefer this syntax. A lot.
Here is the complete NSubstitute version.
var language = Substitute.For<GameLanguage>(); language.DoSomething().Returns("Value"); language.Fizz = "Fizz"; language.Buzz = "Buzz"; _target = new Game(language);